When navigating the complex world of B2B software, review and comparison websites are indispensable for both buyers and vendors. These platforms provide a space for users to share experiences, rate...
voip.ms vs Powernet Global
Compare voip.ms vs Powernet Global. Find out whether voip.ms or Powernet Global is better for your VoIP business or home needs. The experts at VoipReview have analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of voip.ms and Powernet Global and detailed analysis of the comparison can be found below.
User Ratings & Reviews
- 352 Reviews
- 1 Reviews
Overview:
VoIP.ms is a top-of-the-game Montreal-based Voice over IP (VoIP) company founded in 2007. VoIP.ms focuses on cloud communications and prides itself to be the most feature-rich VoIP provider. Its platform is used by over 80,000 customers namely...
PowerNet Global is a full-service residential, business, and wholesale VoIP service provider based out of Cincinannti, Ohio.
PowerNet Global offers a smorgasbord of VoIP and data services. That means a whole lot: Ready? For business,...
Provider Info
- Website: www.voip.ms
- Headquarters Country: Canada
- Founder Year: 2007
- Website:
- Headquarters Country:
- Founder Year: 1999
Plans Available*
- Pay Per Minute Plans - $0.85
- N/A
Users Average Rating
Recent User Reviews
Very good service, technical support answered quickly Very easy to setup, all features setup is web based and no extra costs. Setup within minutes Very good call quality Reasonable price Since service recovered from attack last year, has been very reliable
We finally dumped Big Telecom after rates went up for sub-par internet service, and we couldn't justify the extra cost of maintaining a copper POTS line that was getting spam calls. Granted, there's something to be said for the generally solid reliability of a "proper" landline. Particularly after recent VoIP woes, including a persistent DDoS attack on Voip.ms. I hope their new security-improved setup will prove stable and dependable, and they'll have another stretch of years with few service interruptions. The big plus: A rich set of features including call-screening IVR, multiple sub-accounts, and custom call routing. All at a very reasonable cost at least for light to medium users. That, along with having a cell phone for backup, made it worth staying.
Had this service for two residential lines for 18 months. Voice quality has ranged from poor to mediocre. Have had to reboot ATA many times to get an acceptable voice quality. Customer via voice requires long waits and support staff is language challenged. Not helped by really poor VOIP connection to support. Email support is no better. I've found a new provider who excels at everything for less than 50% of PNG's cost.



