When navigating the complex world of B2B software, review and comparison websites are indispensable for both buyers and vendors. These platforms provide a space for users to share experiences, rate...
Broadvoice vs pbxnsip
Compare Broadvoice vs pbxnsip. Find out whether Broadvoice or pbxnsip is better for your VoIP business or home needs. The experts at VoipReview have analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of Broadvoice and pbxnsip and detailed analysis of the comparison can be found below.
User Ratings & Reviews
- 14 Reviews
- 2 Reviews
Overview:
Broadvoice lets you communicate anywhere in the world. With their platform, there is no costly hardware and no need for multiple phone providers, just cost-saving, cutting-edge cloud phone technology. Customizable, flexible, scalable, intuitive....
pbxnsip has been providing business VoIP solutions to the IP Telephony market since 2005, and since then, have provided their customers with technology and services way ahead of the times. pbxnsip is at the forefront of the industry and always...
Provider Info
- Website: broadvoice.com
- Headquarters Country: United States
- Founder Year: 2007
- Website:
- Headquarters Country:
- Founder Year: 2005
Plans Available*
- Broadvoice SIP Trunking Business Solution - $400.00
- Metered Seat - $10.00
- Professional Seat - $23.00
- Standard Seat - $18.00
- N/A
Users Average Rating
Recent User Reviews
We've been using BroadVoice for the past 4 months at our accounting firm. Set up was pretty easy and we were able to add users as we've grown. The feature set does everything we need it to, so we have no complaints. The system has been reliable as well.
I installed voip.com SIP trunks for a client and the service well. Main location has a T1 and Asterisk phones. Branch offices have broadband and same Asterisk phones and all synced up well. I’d recommend then and plan to recommend to other clients.
We tried to use this system for about a year and it was an absolute nightmare. Dropped calls, phones crashing in the middle of a conference call, FXO sound quality was a complete joke, faxing never worked despite using supposedly supported interop scenarios and T.38 set up correctly, and numerous features that were supposedly included with our system were showing as blocked by the license. When we complained to PBXnSIP (now Snom) and tried to get tech support, they complained to us that we were a direct customer and that was not how they did business, we should instead contact the reseller for tech support. The reseller told us that their only channel of support with PBXnSIP was via the online support forums. It seems that PBXnSIP really went out of their way to try to avoid providing tech support. PBXnSIP was a total waste of time and money and caused a great deal of frustration. We switched to Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express a while ago and couldn't be happier, unlike PBXnSIP it works reliably as advertised, interop with other products is fantastic. Unlike the Snom phones, the sound quality is actually good too.
We had high hopes to save money with them but its been short of a nightmare. We have swithed to a new company and haven't had any problems like with pbxnsip.



